MP 62x42x25 / N38 - ring magnet
ring magnet
Catalog no 030205
GTIN/EAN: 5906301812227
Diameter
62 mm [±0,1 mm]
internal diameter Ø
42 mm [±0,1 mm]
Height
25 mm [±0,1 mm]
Weight
306.31 g
Magnetization Direction
↑ axial
Load capacity
58.67 kg / 575.60 N
Magnetic Induction
389.14 mT / 3891 Gs
Coating
[NiCuNi] Nickel
165.00 ZŁ with VAT / pcs + price for transport
134.15 ZŁ net + 23% VAT / pcs
bulk discounts:
Need more?
Call us
+48 888 99 98 98
otherwise let us know via
request form
through our site.
Force as well as form of magnetic components can be checked with our
magnetic mass calculator.
Orders submitted before 14:00 will be dispatched today!
Technical of the product - MP 62x42x25 / N38 - ring magnet
Specification / characteristics - MP 62x42x25 / N38 - ring magnet
| properties | values |
|---|---|
| Cat. no. | 030205 |
| GTIN/EAN | 5906301812227 |
| Production/Distribution | Dhit sp. z o.o. |
| Country of origin | Poland / China / Germany |
| Customs code | 85059029 |
| Diameter | 62 mm [±0,1 mm] |
| internal diameter Ø | 42 mm [±0,1 mm] |
| Height | 25 mm [±0,1 mm] |
| Weight | 306.31 g |
| Magnetization Direction | ↑ axial |
| Load capacity ~ ? | 58.67 kg / 575.60 N |
| Magnetic Induction ~ ? | 389.14 mT / 3891 Gs |
| Coating | [NiCuNi] Nickel |
| Manufacturing Tolerance | ±0.1 mm |
Magnetic properties of material N38
| properties | values | units |
|---|---|---|
| remenance Br [min. - max.] ? | 12.2-12.6 | kGs |
| remenance Br [min. - max.] ? | 1220-1260 | mT |
| coercivity bHc ? | 10.8-11.5 | kOe |
| coercivity bHc ? | 860-915 | kA/m |
| actual internal force iHc | ≥ 12 | kOe |
| actual internal force iHc | ≥ 955 | kA/m |
| energy density [min. - max.] ? | 36-38 | BH max MGOe |
| energy density [min. - max.] ? | 287-303 | BH max KJ/m |
| max. temperature ? | ≤ 80 | °C |
Physical properties of sintered neodymium magnets Nd2Fe14B at 20°C
| properties | values | units |
|---|---|---|
| Vickers hardness | ≥550 | Hv |
| Density | ≥7.4 | g/cm3 |
| Curie Temperature TC | 312 - 380 | °C |
| Curie Temperature TF | 593 - 716 | °F |
| Specific resistance | 150 | μΩ⋅cm |
| Bending strength | 250 | MPa |
| Compressive strength | 1000~1100 | MPa |
| Thermal expansion parallel (∥) to orientation (M) | (3-4) x 10-6 | °C-1 |
| Thermal expansion perpendicular (⊥) to orientation (M) | -(1-3) x 10-6 | °C-1 |
| Young's modulus | 1.7 x 104 | kg/mm² |
Technical simulation of the magnet - data
These information are the direct effect of a mathematical calculation. Results were calculated on algorithms for the class Nd2Fe14B. Actual parameters may differ from theoretical values. Treat these data as a supplementary guide for designers.
Table 1: Static force (force vs gap) - characteristics
MP 62x42x25 / N38
| Distance (mm) | Induction (Gauss) / mT | Pull Force (kg/lbs/g/N) | Risk Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 mm |
4472 Gs
447.2 mT
|
58.67 kg / 129.35 lbs
58670.0 g / 575.6 N
|
crushing |
| 1 mm |
4338 Gs
433.8 mT
|
55.21 kg / 121.72 lbs
55213.2 g / 541.6 N
|
crushing |
| 2 mm |
4201 Gs
420.1 mT
|
51.77 kg / 114.13 lbs
51768.5 g / 507.8 N
|
crushing |
| 3 mm |
4061 Gs
406.1 mT
|
48.39 kg / 106.69 lbs
48394.9 g / 474.8 N
|
crushing |
| 5 mm |
3781 Gs
378.1 mT
|
41.94 kg / 92.47 lbs
41942.4 g / 411.5 N
|
crushing |
| 10 mm |
3097 Gs
309.7 mT
|
28.15 kg / 62.06 lbs
28148.0 g / 276.1 N
|
crushing |
| 15 mm |
2485 Gs
248.5 mT
|
18.12 kg / 39.94 lbs
18118.5 g / 177.7 N
|
crushing |
| 20 mm |
1972 Gs
197.2 mT
|
11.41 kg / 25.16 lbs
11412.7 g / 112.0 N
|
crushing |
| 30 mm |
1239 Gs
123.9 mT
|
4.51 kg / 9.93 lbs
4505.2 g / 44.2 N
|
medium risk |
| 50 mm |
533 Gs
53.3 mT
|
0.83 kg / 1.84 lbs
832.4 g / 8.2 N
|
weak grip |
Table 2: Shear load (wall)
MP 62x42x25 / N38
| Distance (mm) | Friction coefficient | Pull Force (kg/lbs/g/N) |
|---|---|---|
| 0 mm | Stal (~0.2) |
11.73 kg / 25.87 lbs
11734.0 g / 115.1 N
|
| 1 mm | Stal (~0.2) |
11.04 kg / 24.34 lbs
11042.0 g / 108.3 N
|
| 2 mm | Stal (~0.2) |
10.35 kg / 22.83 lbs
10354.0 g / 101.6 N
|
| 3 mm | Stal (~0.2) |
9.68 kg / 21.34 lbs
9678.0 g / 94.9 N
|
| 5 mm | Stal (~0.2) |
8.39 kg / 18.49 lbs
8388.0 g / 82.3 N
|
| 10 mm | Stal (~0.2) |
5.63 kg / 12.41 lbs
5630.0 g / 55.2 N
|
| 15 mm | Stal (~0.2) |
3.62 kg / 7.99 lbs
3624.0 g / 35.6 N
|
| 20 mm | Stal (~0.2) |
2.28 kg / 5.03 lbs
2282.0 g / 22.4 N
|
| 30 mm | Stal (~0.2) |
0.90 kg / 1.99 lbs
902.0 g / 8.8 N
|
| 50 mm | Stal (~0.2) |
0.17 kg / 0.37 lbs
166.0 g / 1.6 N
|
Table 3: Vertical assembly (sliding) - vertical pull
MP 62x42x25 / N38
| Surface type | Friction coefficient / % Mocy | Max load (kg/lbs/g/N) |
|---|---|---|
| Raw steel |
µ = 0.3
30% Nominalnej Siły
|
17.60 kg / 38.80 lbs
17601.0 g / 172.7 N
|
| Painted steel (standard) |
µ = 0.2
20% Nominalnej Siły
|
11.73 kg / 25.87 lbs
11734.0 g / 115.1 N
|
| Oily/slippery steel |
µ = 0.1
10% Nominalnej Siły
|
5.87 kg / 12.93 lbs
5867.0 g / 57.6 N
|
| Magnet with anti-slip rubber |
µ = 0.5
50% Nominalnej Siły
|
29.34 kg / 64.67 lbs
29335.0 g / 287.8 N
|
Table 4: Material efficiency (saturation) - power losses
MP 62x42x25 / N38
| Steel thickness (mm) | % power | Real pull force (kg/lbs/g/N) |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 mm |
|
1.96 kg / 4.31 lbs
1955.7 g / 19.2 N
|
| 1 mm |
|
4.89 kg / 10.78 lbs
4889.2 g / 48.0 N
|
| 2 mm |
|
9.78 kg / 21.56 lbs
9778.3 g / 95.9 N
|
| 3 mm |
|
14.67 kg / 32.34 lbs
14667.5 g / 143.9 N
|
| 5 mm |
|
24.45 kg / 53.89 lbs
24445.8 g / 239.8 N
|
| 10 mm |
|
48.89 kg / 107.79 lbs
48891.7 g / 479.6 N
|
| 11 mm |
|
53.78 kg / 118.57 lbs
53780.8 g / 527.6 N
|
| 12 mm |
|
58.67 kg / 129.35 lbs
58670.0 g / 575.6 N
|
Table 5: Thermal resistance (stability) - power drop
MP 62x42x25 / N38
| Ambient temp. (°C) | Power loss | Remaining pull (kg/lbs/g/N) | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 °C | 0.0% |
58.67 kg / 129.35 lbs
58670.0 g / 575.6 N
|
OK |
| 40 °C | -2.2% |
57.38 kg / 126.50 lbs
57379.3 g / 562.9 N
|
OK |
| 60 °C | -4.4% |
56.09 kg / 123.65 lbs
56088.5 g / 550.2 N
|
OK |
| 80 °C | -6.6% |
54.80 kg / 120.81 lbs
54797.8 g / 537.6 N
|
|
| 100 °C | -28.8% |
41.77 kg / 92.09 lbs
41773.0 g / 409.8 N
|
Table 6: Magnet-Magnet interaction (attraction) - field collision
MP 62x42x25 / N38
| Gap (mm) | Attraction (kg/lbs) (N-S) | Shear Force (kg/lbs/g/N) | Repulsion (kg/lbs) (N-N) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 mm |
264.93 kg / 584.07 lbs
5 588 Gs
|
39.74 kg / 87.61 lbs
39740 g / 389.8 N
|
N/A |
| 1 mm |
257.19 kg / 567.00 lbs
8 812 Gs
|
38.58 kg / 85.05 lbs
38578 g / 378.4 N
|
231.47 kg / 510.30 lbs
~0 Gs
|
| 2 mm |
249.32 kg / 549.66 lbs
8 676 Gs
|
37.40 kg / 82.45 lbs
37398 g / 366.9 N
|
224.39 kg / 494.69 lbs
~0 Gs
|
| 3 mm |
241.51 kg / 532.44 lbs
8 539 Gs
|
36.23 kg / 79.87 lbs
36227 g / 355.4 N
|
217.36 kg / 479.19 lbs
~0 Gs
|
| 5 mm |
226.10 kg / 498.47 lbs
8 262 Gs
|
33.92 kg / 74.77 lbs
33915 g / 332.7 N
|
203.49 kg / 448.62 lbs
~0 Gs
|
| 10 mm |
189.40 kg / 417.55 lbs
7 562 Gs
|
28.41 kg / 62.63 lbs
28409 g / 278.7 N
|
170.46 kg / 375.79 lbs
~0 Gs
|
| 20 mm |
127.11 kg / 280.22 lbs
6 195 Gs
|
19.07 kg / 42.03 lbs
19066 g / 187.0 N
|
114.40 kg / 252.20 lbs
~0 Gs
|
| 50 mm |
32.28 kg / 71.17 lbs
3 122 Gs
|
4.84 kg / 10.68 lbs
4843 g / 47.5 N
|
29.06 kg / 64.06 lbs
~0 Gs
|
| 60 mm |
20.34 kg / 44.85 lbs
2 478 Gs
|
3.05 kg / 6.73 lbs
3052 g / 29.9 N
|
18.31 kg / 40.36 lbs
~0 Gs
|
| 70 mm |
12.99 kg / 28.63 lbs
1 980 Gs
|
1.95 kg / 4.29 lbs
1948 g / 19.1 N
|
11.69 kg / 25.77 lbs
~0 Gs
|
| 80 mm |
8.43 kg / 18.59 lbs
1 595 Gs
|
1.26 kg / 2.79 lbs
1265 g / 12.4 N
|
7.59 kg / 16.73 lbs
~0 Gs
|
| 90 mm |
5.58 kg / 12.29 lbs
1 298 Gs
|
0.84 kg / 1.84 lbs
836 g / 8.2 N
|
5.02 kg / 11.06 lbs
~0 Gs
|
| 100 mm |
3.76 kg / 8.29 lbs
1 065 Gs
|
0.56 kg / 1.24 lbs
564 g / 5.5 N
|
3.38 kg / 7.46 lbs
~0 Gs
|
Table 7: Hazards (electronics) - warnings
MP 62x42x25 / N38
| Object / Device | Limit (Gauss) / mT | Safe distance |
|---|---|---|
| Pacemaker | 5 Gs (0.5 mT) | 32.5 cm |
| Hearing aid | 10 Gs (1.0 mT) | 25.5 cm |
| Mechanical watch | 20 Gs (2.0 mT) | 20.0 cm |
| Mobile device | 40 Gs (4.0 mT) | 15.5 cm |
| Remote | 50 Gs (5.0 mT) | 14.0 cm |
| Payment card | 400 Gs (40.0 mT) | 6.0 cm |
| HDD hard drive | 600 Gs (60.0 mT) | 5.0 cm |
Table 8: Collisions (cracking risk) - warning
MP 62x42x25 / N38
| Start from (mm) | Speed (km/h) | Energy (J) | Predicted outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 mm |
17.65 km/h
(4.90 m/s)
|
3.68 J | |
| 30 mm |
25.31 km/h
(7.03 m/s)
|
7.57 J | |
| 50 mm |
31.49 km/h
(8.75 m/s)
|
11.72 J | |
| 100 mm |
44.16 km/h
(12.27 m/s)
|
23.04 J |
Table 9: Anti-corrosion coating durability
MP 62x42x25 / N38
| Technical parameter | Value / Description |
|---|---|
| Coating type | [NiCuNi] Nickel |
| Layer structure | Nickel - Copper - Nickel |
| Layer thickness | 10-20 µm |
| Salt spray test (SST) ? | 24 h |
| Recommended environment | Indoors only (dry) |
Table 10: Construction data (Flux)
MP 62x42x25 / N38
| Parameter | Value | SI Unit / Description |
|---|---|---|
| Magnetic Flux | 100 906 Mx | 1009.1 µWb |
| Pc Coefficient | 0.64 | High (Stable) |
Table 11: Underwater work (magnet fishing)
MP 62x42x25 / N38
| Environment | Effective steel pull | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Air (land) | 58.67 kg | Standard |
| Water (riverbed) |
67.18 kg
(+8.51 kg buoyancy gain)
|
+14.5% |
1. Vertical hold
*Note: On a vertical surface, the magnet holds just ~20% of its max power.
2. Steel thickness impact
*Thin steel (e.g. 0.5mm PC case) drastically limits the holding force.
3. Heat tolerance
*For N38 material, the critical limit is 80°C.
4. Demagnetization curve and operating point (B-H)
chart generated for the permeance coefficient Pc (Permeance Coefficient) = 0.64
This simulation demonstrates the magnetic stability of the selected magnet under specific geometric conditions. The solid red line represents the demagnetization curve (material potential), while the dashed blue line is the load line based on the magnet's geometry. The Pc (Permeance Coefficient), also known as the load line slope, is a dimensionless value that describes the relationship between the magnet's shape and its magnetic stability. The intersection of these two lines (the black dot) is the operating point — it determines the actual magnetic flux density generated by the magnet in this specific configuration. A higher Pc value means the magnet is more 'slender' (tall relative to its area), resulting in a higher operating point and better resistance to irreversible demagnetization caused by external fields or temperature. A value of 0.42 is relatively low (typical for flat magnets), meaning the operating point is closer to the 'knee' of the curve — caution is advised when operating at temperatures near the maximum limit to avoid strength loss.
Chemical composition
| iron (Fe) | 64% – 68% |
| neodymium (Nd) | 29% – 32% |
| boron (B) | 1.1% – 1.2% |
| dysprosium (Dy) | 0.5% – 2.0% |
| coating (Ni-Cu-Ni) | < 0.05% |
Environmental data
| recyclability (EoL) | 100% |
| recycled raw materials | ~10% (pre-cons) |
| carbon footprint | low / zredukowany |
| waste code (EWC) | 16 02 16 |
Other proposals
Pros and cons of neodymium magnets.
Strengths
- Their strength is maintained, and after approximately ten years it drops only by ~1% (according to research),
- They are noted for resistance to demagnetization induced by external field influence,
- A magnet with a smooth gold surface has better aesthetics,
- They feature high magnetic induction at the operating surface, which improves attraction properties,
- Thanks to resistance to high temperature, they can operate (depending on the form) even at temperatures up to 230°C and higher...
- Thanks to modularity in forming and the ability to modify to client solutions,
- Significant place in future technologies – they find application in HDD drives, electric motors, medical devices, and technologically advanced constructions.
- Compactness – despite small sizes they generate large force, making them ideal for precision applications
Limitations
- They are prone to damage upon heavy impacts. To avoid cracks, it is worth securing magnets using a steel holder. Such protection not only shields the magnet but also increases its resistance to damage
- Neodymium magnets decrease their strength under the influence of heating. As soon as 80°C is exceeded, many of them start losing their power. Therefore, we recommend our special magnets marked [AH], which maintain stability even at temperatures up to 230°C
- Due to the susceptibility of magnets to corrosion in a humid environment, we recommend using waterproof magnets made of rubber, plastic or other material stable to moisture, in case of application outdoors
- We suggest a housing - magnetic mechanism, due to difficulties in creating nuts inside the magnet and complicated forms.
- Potential hazard to health – tiny shards of magnets pose a threat, if swallowed, which becomes key in the context of child safety. Additionally, small components of these products are able to be problematic in diagnostics medical when they are in the body.
- High unit price – neodymium magnets have a higher price than other types of magnets (e.g. ferrite), which hinders application in large quantities
Pull force analysis
Breakaway strength of the magnet in ideal conditions – what contributes to it?
- on a base made of structural steel, optimally conducting the magnetic field
- with a cross-section minimum 10 mm
- with an ideally smooth contact surface
- with direct contact (no impurities)
- for force applied at a right angle (pull-off, not shear)
- at conditions approx. 20°C
Lifting capacity in real conditions – factors
- Space between magnet and steel – even a fraction of a millimeter of distance (caused e.g. by veneer or unevenness) diminishes the pulling force, often by half at just 0.5 mm.
- Force direction – catalog parameter refers to pulling vertically. When attempting to slide, the magnet exhibits significantly lower power (typically approx. 20-30% of maximum force).
- Wall thickness – thin material does not allow full use of the magnet. Magnetic flux passes through the material instead of generating force.
- Steel grade – the best choice is high-permeability steel. Stainless steels may generate lower lifting capacity.
- Smoothness – full contact is possible only on polished steel. Rough texture create air cushions, weakening the magnet.
- Temperature – temperature increase results in weakening of force. Check the thermal limit for a given model.
Lifting capacity was measured using a smooth steel plate of suitable thickness (min. 20 mm), under perpendicular pulling force, whereas under parallel forces the load capacity is reduced by as much as fivefold. Moreover, even a small distance between the magnet’s surface and the plate lowers the holding force.
Safety rules for work with neodymium magnets
Permanent damage
Control the heat. Heating the magnet above 80 degrees Celsius will permanently weaken its properties and pulling force.
Handling guide
Handle with care. Neodymium magnets act from a distance and connect with massive power, often quicker than you can react.
Threat to navigation
Be aware: neodymium magnets produce a field that interferes with precision electronics. Keep a safe distance from your mobile, tablet, and GPS.
Pacemakers
Medical warning: Strong magnets can deactivate heart devices and defibrillators. Do not approach if you have electronic implants.
No play value
Strictly keep magnets away from children. Ingestion danger is high, and the consequences of magnets clamping inside the body are tragic.
Threat to electronics
Powerful magnetic fields can destroy records on payment cards, HDDs, and other magnetic media. Stay away of at least 10 cm.
Finger safety
Risk of injury: The attraction force is so immense that it can result in blood blisters, crushing, and broken bones. Protective gloves are recommended.
Do not drill into magnets
Combustion risk: Neodymium dust is explosive. Avoid machining magnets in home conditions as this may cause fire.
Allergic reactions
It is widely known that nickel (standard magnet coating) is a common allergen. If your skin reacts to metals, avoid touching magnets with bare hands and opt for encased magnets.
Material brittleness
NdFeB magnets are ceramic materials, which means they are fragile like glass. Collision of two magnets will cause them shattering into shards.
